KatieDuck has been investigating theater, dance and music with live performance for over 30 years.  In her workshop, she takes a microscopic view on the role improvisation plays in a live performance combining her background in the performing arts with her curiosity for advances in brain studies, music and movement research.

Katie guides the dancers and performers through physical exercises that highlight how the eyes and ears affect movement choices. She extends the workshop toward improvisation sessions by setting a fictional front in the studio space and then declaring this as a platform to choose pause, flow or exit. This platform highlights how the limit of these three choices can already provide the frame for a composition to take place, and that misunderstanding, coincidence, live time, interactivity, messiness, emotions, intuition and inspiration are basic materials in a creative process. These raw materials are integrated with the combined fact that everyone in the workshop group can choose.

The improvisation sessions are given a delegated time frame with an option for the workshop group to shift, drop or lift the space at will. This shifting, dropping and lifting of the performance space places each individual in a position where they need to be to be fully awake or they will recognizably loose the thread of creative activity in play.

Choice is introduced to the workshop group as a compositional reality but also as a means for individuals to choose to participate in the performative, musical or as a viewer and yet remain involved in the process. These experimental physical activities gathers the workshop group to recognize that in a creative process time is passing at different perceived speeds and that space is shifting in several dimensions at once. This awareness creates a presence in the space. This sustained presence of space is eventually placed in the hands of the workshop group in improvisation sessions.

The combination of moving, seeing, hearing, feeling and deliberately volunteering to expose myself in front of an audience alters my perception of time, space and emotions. What I do for a living is an induced neuron madness”
Katie Duck

I am not interested in the moment even though it does feel good. I am interested in movement and the fact that time is passing. It is a kind of hippie hype to encourage someone to be in the moment.”
Katie Duck

A fully awake body is rarely pedestrian. The body awake needs to be discovered and demands a discipline beyond everyday tasks. And yet when I see movement that does not respect the beauty of the body as pedestrian I become uncomfortable. How the body works and how I see a body is not so different an activity in how I feel. To not respect the body as an already perfect place of motion is like watching a dog trying to learn ballet.”
Katie Duck


Katie’s collaboration with Alfredo Genovesi began in 2008 when they discovered that they shared a deep interest in the creative process that improvisation implies. Alongside the workshop description with Katie Duck’s workshop, Alfredo Genovesi provides his experience with instrumental technique and improvisation music and dance performances.

Alfredo explores ways of extending the sonic palette and musical choices available guiding the musicians toward Improvisations that range from completely open to structured games and strategies. Katie and Alfredo guide the workshop group as a whole to experience degrees of real-time dialog and equally contribute feedback for the dancers, performers and musicians out of their unique musical and performing arts history and knowledge.

In my experience it is best to remain open to change and the flow of new ideas during the creation and performance of music for dance. Often the emphasis is on the emergence of simple musical ideas, the choices made about when and how to develop and evolve these ideas, and the confidence to let go and move on into new musical territory at any moment”.
Alfredo Genovesi

I do not approach the work as a master of improvisation and music/dance. Hierarchy, or an assumption of such, helps neither the practice nor the music itself. I have learnt that my tendency/mode of approach is to explore ways of sticking to and evolving material always allowing for shift with an emphasis on the development of simple cellular ideas & material”.
Alfredo Genovesi